Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoto Credits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Kyoto Protocol seems the obvious thing to do. -Splash^talk 23:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kyoto Credits

I propose this article to be deleted. What is described is vaguely similar to the CDM, and perhaps mixed up with green investment schemes. The term the author used 'kyoto credits' is sometimes used interchangeably with credits from CDM and JI, though it is not official terminology. The author also cites no sources. Jens Nielsen 10:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

(Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kyoto_Credits")

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 19:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge to Kyoto Protocal --CyclePat 21:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to Kyoto Protocol (Kyoto Protocol#Emissions trading seems to have the relevant info, more could be added there). -- Jonel | Speak 02:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Well, I suggest simply delete, as I doubt the term is clearly defined. If you do want to have a redirect, I suggest Flexible Mechanisms instead. Jens Nielsen 21:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep or merge per CyclePat --Colonel Cow 21:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Kyoto Protocol or to some article on emissions trading scheme (too lazy to look up what it'd be right now). The term Kyoto Credits isn't notable itself. MLA 11:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.