Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 20:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kwiki

Kwiki (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This article about a wiki engine was previously speedy deleted as non-notable; it doesn't pass the main criterion proposed at WP:SOFTWARE (a Google search doesn't reveal any non-trivial published works). This new version of the article also spends most of its time describing what is supposed to happen in the next version. WP:NOT a crystal ball. -- Earle Martin [^t/_c] 21:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Alexa rating of 208,106 + minimal non-trivial published works = no evidence of notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete. per nom. Rettetast

Keep, Socialtext is based on this. Vjdchauhan 06:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC).

Keep. What Vjdchauhan said. If there are concerns about the current revision, an earlier version is also available [1]. --David Iberri (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete. ‘Kwiki has been used by the Perl community as the de facto choice for wiki creation.’ would establish notability, but is unreferenced. —xyzzy_n 23:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

A statement which is also both dubious and unprovable. -- Earle Martin [^t/_c] 23:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.