Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kull (Inheritance)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 1ne 07:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kull (Inheritance)

All of the current info is already written in a better style here. The article is choppy and uncyclopedic. I vote delete. Hemhem20X6 00:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. If necessary, add information from Kull to Urgal, as there is some slightly more specific information there. Xiliquiern 01:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment What in this article isn't already in the Urgal article?Hemhem20X6 01:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    • I misread some of the information - you are right, the Kull article is redundant. Xiliquiern 01:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge but then again, why exactly are we keeping the Urgal article? Per WP:FICT all this should be consolidated into one article about the universe of these books. Pascal.Tesson 01:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment What in WP:FICT justifies deleting that article?Hemhem20X6 01:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Where did you see Pascal.Tesson write the word "delete"? Uncle G 15:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Sugarpine t/c 23:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Redirect to Urgal, if it's a term likely to be searched for: I can't judge its notability since I'm unfamiliar with the topic (even after having read the article, hence "delete".) --Storkk 23:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Urgal. Markovich292 22:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.