Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kondremul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kondremul

This article is basically just one sentence at the beginning, a list of ingredients, and two uses for this medicine, and it all looks like it came off the side of the medicine bottle —Mets501 (talk) 02:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - spamvertisement. Probably added in good faith but of no more note than the ingrediants listing on a nn breakfast cereal. - Peripitus (Talk) 08:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect. This should be redirected to the article about the general version of the medicine. (ie. Lipitor redirects to Atorvastatin). I don't have a good enough understanding of drugs to tell you which is its respective general article, but I am sure someone else will.--SomeStranger^(t|c) 10:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete product is not notable. Ydam 10:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Whoa, IntriguedIrishGuy certainly has a low level for being intrigued. And very possibly has been confused by the article Anacin. Anacin was started by someone else, but has given IntriguedIrishGuy the idea that individual medicines, back-of-bottle descriptions, and their individual ingredients are somehow interesting. Please note Allerest (expanded from redirect to list of ingredients), Americaine (created), Aspergum (created), Bacid (created), Caldecort (created), Caldesene (created), Bonine (created), Cepestat (created), Chooz (created), and N'ice (created yesterday). I'm sorry, but I call this a Wiki-test, an experiment in pain thresholds if you will. Delete all these Shenme 11:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I just noticed, these names are in roughly alphabetical order. Either the editor is very neat in his medicine cabinet, or this is an experiment! Shenme 11:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Advert Matthew Fenton (TALK - CONTRIBS) 12:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; it does indeed read like it came from the packaging. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.