Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knobbler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] knobbler
I highly doubt the investigative or academic value of this entry...the fact that I have never heard of the expression "Knobbler" doesn't necessarily mean that it does not exist as a colloquial usage, of course, but the provision of atleast a basic etymology would give more credence to the entry. The rather heated emotional tone of the piece, with the climactic insertion of a reference to 'clueless Cluster customers", which is in no way foreshadowed or explained, would lead me to believe that the entry is some sort of backhanded invective against, well, god knows what. Perhaps someone could shed some light on this...Kenneth Tyrone
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Knobbler"
- Delete I call WP:BALLS. Just zis Guy you know? 22:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as absolute crap. Brian G. Crawford 23:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Kukini 16:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I believe the wikipedian who nominates is not supposed to also vote. Kukini 16:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Which wikipedian are you referring to? Dangherous AKA Kenneth Tyrone nominated. Procedure states "There is no requirement to put anything in the Edit summary, but "first delete reason" is appropriate." Therefore, the nom clearly can voice an opinion on what to do. It's also inferred that it's a delete recommendation Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Noms_w.2Fo_delete_recommendations.3F_Not_that_it.27s_a_vote. Шизомби 16:16, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad. Kukini 16:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Which wikipedian are you referring to? Dangherous AKA Kenneth Tyrone nominated. Procedure states "There is no requirement to put anything in the Edit summary, but "first delete reason" is appropriate." Therefore, the nom clearly can voice an opinion on what to do. It's also inferred that it's a delete recommendation Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Noms_w.2Fo_delete_recommendations.3F_Not_that_it.27s_a_vote. Шизомби 16:16, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
