Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knightquest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep – Gurch 14:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Knightquest

• delete nn-fancruft— Milkandwookiees ^(T | C) 16:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Article asserts notability (shot on film, won awards at an independent film festival). Kafziel 16:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as per above. wikipediatrix 16:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep as per above. Milkandwookiees has suddenly nominated an awful lot of articles for deletion with very flimsy reasoning. Possible {{WP:POINT]]? TheRealFennShysa 16:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Per above. The Wookieepedian 16:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete : can't buy this non-notable production on Amazon. Or anywhere else apparently. And it won awards at a fanfilm festival, not at "an independent film festival". Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Unless the festival was operated by the film company, it's independent. I'm not sure where you're getting your criteria, but not being able to buy something doesn't mean it isn't notable. Kafziel 16:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Passes the porn test. (Award winner) -- GWO
• Delete. Per original nomination. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 19:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:WEB, and possibly WP:FILM. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Arthur Rubin. -LtNOWIS 02:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep (Personal attack removed)--D2K 19:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.