Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Hearts 3: Age of Dragons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox 11:46, 28 May '06
[edit] Kingdom Hearts 3: Age of Dragons
Article about a fan-based; non-notable game. Doesn't meet Wikipedia standards. Had {{prod}} on it, but was removed by creator/fans. DGX 20:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No assertion of notability, or evidence that the game actually exists. -- SCZenz 20:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not notable. DarthVader 22:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- DELETE ALL FAN-MADE GAMES! Especially articles for games whose homepages are freespace sites. Oh yeah, and "Kingdom Hearts 3: Age of Dragons" gets ZERO Google hits. -- Kicking222 23:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it Look you freaks, I don't give about how many Google hits I have. What the heck makes it so unworthy, ANSWER Me THAT!! And Kicking222, just put a sock in it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darkside597 (talk • contribs).
- Look Darkside597, I know you created the article, but that deosn't give you the right to call people freaks and make personal attacks, so settle down. Now, WP:V and WP:N are pretty clear about what can and cannot be on Wikipedia. Google hits determine if it's verifiable. And don't hand me, the offical site is down junk, because even if it does have it's own website, one source is not enough. DGX 02:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- First, calm down. Then - the question isn't why we think the game is not notable. A better question is, what makes the game notable? We don't have specific notability criteria for games (though WP:SOFTWARE might apply in certain cases), but I personally believe a country- or worldwide release though a distributor could qualify, as would coverage by a notable game publication. And, of course, the fact that the game has to be either released or in the state that release readiness is merely a matter of polish. Does this game meet those guidelines? If so, I'll be glad to change my opinion. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 11:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete with prejudice WP:VANITY, NN, admission by author that it isn't notable Hobbeslover 01:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I thought I already nomintated this article for deletion. Non-notable game and vanity page. --Starionwolf 05:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Unreleased game, no media coverage or even web buzz whatsoever, home page doesn't tell even the bits the article has. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 11:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Save I know there have been a few here are angry at you guys for wanting this deleted. Well, I don't want you to think we are all immature 12 year olds. Rather than trying to defend why it should stay on here, I am going to take a different approach. Is there anything that we can do to save it? Is there any way we can improve upon it so that it won't be deleted? I am new to Wikipedia, as are mos of the people defending this article, so we don't know how to make a proper article, so any help would be appreciated.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
