Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of the Hill Episode Descriptions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus (4d, 5r, 1m), defaults to keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:59, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] King of the Hill Episode Descriptions

Information in article is an inferior duplication of the information at List of King of the Hill Episodes Wikipedianinthehouse 23:46, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nomination. --Dalkaen^T/C 00:44, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Wouldn't redirect be better? Grutness...wha? 01:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Not necessarily. I took a look at what linked to the article, and only the King of the Hill article, a talk page, and deletion-related articles link to it. Redirection might be unnecessary. --Dalkaen^T/C 01:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. Original article with data in tabular form is much more readable. Eddie.willers 01:38, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, more listcruft. --Dante (Δαντε) 03:06, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. I find it better to remove all the text and redirect to the List of King of the Hill episodes, instead of deleting it. Then it would be possible to (easily) find the older versions of this page for reference. Removing this just wouldn't sound right. --FlyingPenguins 04:35, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. I see no harm in that. 23skidoo 06:38, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. Put with the list of episodes. The Republican 13:57, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with List of King of the Hill episodes. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 17:22, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
  • The text from this page was already merged with the List of King of the Hill Episodes. --FlyingPenguins 18:19, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
    • In that case, isn't it the rule that you have to leave a redirect there, instead of deleting it, for licence purposes? The history of who authored that stuff needs to be kept around. Jacqui ^{★ 22:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)}
• Delete without redirect (no one will search this term) and without merge (info already covered). Youngamerican 15:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.