Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Kong II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to King Kong Lives. Kimchi.sg 01:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] King Kong II

This is just weird. The movie described in this article doesn't exist, so it seems to be some sort of strange joke/hoax. --Hetar 20:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

• DeleteRedirect to King Kong Lives per Apostrophe: Not a hoax per-se; according to the author's other edit [1], it's an "idea for a movie a friend of his has". Just as deleteable redirectable as the nom.'s reason though! Certainly not notable enough for an article --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 04:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing on IMDB. --D-Day ^{I'm all ears} 20:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Hoax Kershner 20:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. tedious W guice 21:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable/hoax. Gwernol 22:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 'King Kong II is a fictional movie invented by Dennis Davidson' Jammo (SM247) 01:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as hoax. 23skidoo 02:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete article as hoax and redirect to King Kong Lives, as it was released as King Kong 2 in some countries. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 03:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Apostrophe (in fact, one of the widest known posters for the movie was the King Kong 2 version - see IMDB entry). Phædriel ♥ tell me - 12:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.