Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kforce

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:57, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kforce

Non-notable company. No potential for expansion beyond a stock symbol and the company's URL. --Quuxplusone 02:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete (nominator's vote) --Quuxplusone 02:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Publicly listed company on NASDAQ for 10 years. It is a company with 80 offices and over 1,000 staff see webpage [1]. A Google search for KForce gets over a million pages returned [2] and Fortune Magazine listed it as a small cap to watch see [3]. There are currently 8 Google news results. [4]. Capitalistroadster 03:01, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep publicly listed. DDerby(talk) 06:57, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per above. Groeck 16:28, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep could always add information about how bad it sucks to work for Kforce: the McDonald of the IT Staffing industry--Isotope23 16:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as above ··gracefool |☺ 21:53, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.