Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Davies (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, for now, to give it a chance to grow. I have no prejudice against this article being renominated for deletion in the future if the concerns of the delete !voters are not met. Deathphoenix ʕ 03:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kevin Davies (actor)

Has seemingly only been in one show, I'm with Stupid (TV series). Does this make him notable? I don't remember. Other users can squabble over whether or not he deserves an article. I mean....look at some wiki-policies that I'm too lazy to read. --Dangherous 16:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not only does the article make no claim to notability, according to the BBC his name is Davids not Davies, so if the sources can't even agree on the name then I'd say that notability is defintely not established. I can't even find a CV from his agents online, so there is virtually nothign to say about the guy. I would advocate a merge if there was anything to merge, but there isn't. Guy 11:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. NN, and a useless substub at the moment. David | Talk 11:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• don't delete this artical is beinging to grow and was brought int oexistatnce so that the artical about I'm with stupid can focuse on the series rahter thant he actor. Back ache 11:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep actor with major role in a fairly notable TV series. The IMDB seems to confirm the "Davies" spelling, so I guess the BBC is in error. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep one significant role in a show on a major network is enough for me. Mister.Manticore 02:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per Manticore. People Powered 01:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.