Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katheryn K. Russell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:22, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Katheryn K. Russell

Non-notable professor jucifer 21:26, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - profesor who fails the "professor test". Low google results. Perhaps vanity. jucifer 21:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral. Easily verifiable but I need more info to decide on notability. Do we actually have established criteria for notability of academic people (professor test)? - Haukur Þorgeirsson 22:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Nah, check WP:BIO and Wikipedia talk:Criteria for inclusion of biographies/Academics (and please weigh in, as the discussion has gotten stale), but if you can find a reasonable number of publications by an academic, s/he is likely ultimately to be kept. u p p l a n d 07:37, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Now I've read through that and I'm even more confused than before. The problem seems intractable. I've wrote some academics stub myself; Óskar Halldórsson, Hermann Pálsson], Sigurður Nordal... I'd say Nordal is definitely notable - he's in Britannica, for one thing. In my opinion Hermann Pálsson is notable too but Óskar may be more marginal and I'm not sure if I'd create a stub on him if I'd been thinking about it today. Nevertheless his is a name you'll see come up in a "History of Icelandic Literature" type of work - even if only for his research on Hrafnkels saga.

But it really depends on how deep a coverage of the relevant subject we have. Once we have a deep coverage of the Icelandic sagas it will be very useful to have articles on the academics who have contributed most to their study. Because that's a field I know well I feel I can make reasonable judgment calls on what biographies to include at each stage.

But in the field of Katheryn K. Russell I'm completely lost. So I guess my vote is: "Leave it up to people who know something about that field." - Haukur Þorgeirsson 11:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Keep — Based on a google search she seems to be fairly well published and frequently referenced by others. — RJH 17:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Citations seem notable enough; just over the bar, but keep when in doubt. Xoloz 03:45, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.