Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapoutland Pro Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kapoutland Pro Wrestling

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

Long article on nonnotable fantasy/Internet "wrestling league"; 13 unique Ghits. NawlinWiki 03:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• This is the greatest Wikipedia link of all time. Its sweet8 and everything. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JSKANK88 (talk • contribs). (article creator)

• KPW is great. Who are you to doubt them? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.112.215.128 (talk • contribs). (user's only edit)
• Delete as spam for a site that would fail WP:WEB. Wikipedia is not myspace. --DarkAudit 17:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. hateless 18:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Jeez Louise. That's really all I have to say. -- Kicking222 18:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Good Lord! Delete, spam for a non-notable website for a non-notable organization. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all deletes above, looks like a worthy WP:SNOW candidate. Can we go one day without a backyard wrestling article? --Kinu ^t/_c 21:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• First of all, no, this isn't a "backyard wrestling article" as you so put it Kinu. Secondly, this isn't spam for a site that would fail. The site is anything but failing. We have new participants at a contant rate. By putting something on here, it allows more people to get an introduction to a game that is fun to play. I for one say Do Not Delete the article. Then again, what do I know. I'm simply a wrestling fan, a group of people who are looked down upon by the rest of civilization for watching "fake rasslin", and I'm also a gamer, yet another group of people who are looked down upon and considered "geeks" who live in their parent's basement. We're people, just like the rest of you, and we're simply trying to reach other people. --187inthe317
  • Comment: It seems that many wrestling leagues have been posting articles recently, most likely out of sheer coincidence, and I apologize if my comment was somewhat coarse and based on that generalization. However, please note that AfD is not a debate as to the merits of wrestling, its fans, etc., but whether the article itself meets the "rough justice" Wikipedia criteria for inclusion. In this case, the guideline used by other editors is WP:WEB, and unfortunately no evidence from reliable sources is presented that such is the case. You are more than welcome to address those issues so that the community may make a more informed decision. Thanks! --Kinu ^t/_c 04:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• there is no message anywhere telling people to come here and say KPW should stay. KPW wont fail, it's still running and means alot to the people who are a part of it. Hell, they gave up time to write this long article. I say keep it. Introduce new people to a fun game, that anyone can do. And i have too much respect for wrestlers to attempt any backyard wrestling. KPW is electronic, not set up in someones garden.

Kim —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.142.173.77 (talk • contribs). Note: User's first edit.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.