Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDK
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 05:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] KDK
non notable Qaz (talk) 06:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. If someone is noteable enough for someone to write an article about them with out the subject's knowlage, then it's worth keeping. Notable. User:masterstghm
- Keep, There's nothing wrong with this entry. Also, What the heck is that supposed to mean? Tell me Qaz, What the heck do you mean by "non notable"? Pezboy (talk) 06:15, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- He means that the subject isn't of encyclopedic interest, being "just" someone prank calling people. This article needs to establish that KDK is newsworthy or of historical interest, or somehow otherwise notable in an encyclopedic way or else this article will be deleted, as it's not practical to have articles about every single person on the planet.
Just as a quick tip: you can sign your posts by adding ~~~~ to the end of your comment. If you want to have a username (I see User:Pezboy doesn't seem to be taken), just click the register link up in the righthand corner of the screen. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 08:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- He means that the subject isn't of encyclopedic interest, being "just" someone prank calling people. This article needs to establish that KDK is newsworthy or of historical interest, or somehow otherwise notable in an encyclopedic way or else this article will be deleted, as it's not practical to have articles about every single person on the planet.
- Delete. Doesn't seem newsworthy or otherwise notable. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 08:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per A Man In Black. -- Kjkolb 09:31, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. Sandstein 10:57, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Correcting myself I seem to get a fair few relevant hits on google for KDK Prank Calls. How many are more than just directory listings I'm not sure Marcus22 13:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, if/when deleted, make sure to remove the link from List of prank call comedians and list Image:Kdk.jpg on IfD. -Nameneko 19:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Gtabary 23:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nn or vanity. --fvw* 11:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. There are claims of notability here, so not speedy delete, but I don't buy the article as establishign notability overall. DES (talk) 20:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Gamaliel 09:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. KDK is indeed well know among people who are familiar with prank callers. KDK's website is ranked #2 on Alexa under the category "Top > Recreation > Humor > Pranks > Prank Calls" and is ranked #241,034 out of all websites indexed on Alexa. SATAN 05:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC) (preceding comment by 12.76.48.67 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC))
- Delete per above delete arguments. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 05:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
