Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet (Lost)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Previously deleted on July 26th 2006. Can be recreated when character appears in first-run episode.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  08:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Juliet (Lost)

According to accepted practice within Lost editors, characters should only get their own articles if they have flashback episodes or if the actor/actress that portrays them is listed in the opening credits. The bulk of this article's information comes from one link. This article should or should not be recreated in October, but not now in July. -- Wikipedical 16:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. -- Wikipedical 16:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's basically empty, and anything added to it would violate Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. alphaChimp ^laudare 16:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. -- PKtm 17:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The article says her episode count is zero. --Metropolitan90 17:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep because she will be listed in the opening credits in October, and if we delete this page, it will be recreated anyway. --Demon Hog 16:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. -- Lumaga 20:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep she is a new character, and the entry will be expanded on later. --ChinaNailStorm 13:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Can always re-create later, for now, the article is useless and will remain so for some time. -- Banes 20:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If and when such a character actually appears and generates significant content, then she may be deserving of an article.--Leflyman^Talk 07:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep She will be featured in the opening credits soon, and the article WILL be recreated anyway. Rose has her own article and she only had one flashback. Why waste the time recreating it again in 2 months when it is here right now. It's not bothering anyone, and it lets people know that this character will be important in the upcoming season. There's no really reason to delete it, and it will be recreated anyway... 216.108.207.53 19:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.