Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Gentry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Julie Gentry, contested keep for the other two. Richardcavell 23:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Julie Gentry
This person appeared on one season of a reality television show, and did nothing else. This is not notable, and in particular, fails WP:BIO. NatusRoma | Talk 23:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- For similar reasons, I am bundling the following pages with this nomination:
- Keep Kyle and delete the other two. Acting in a show is notable, appearing in a reality show is not, unless you do something notable on the show or achieve media coverage on your own. Articles assert neither. --Aguerriero (talk) 04:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree: Keep Kyle and delete the other two. Kyle Brandt is a regular on Days of Our Lives. Doc502 16:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Lindsay. She also spent over a year as a morning-drive DJ on Q100 in Atlanta -- on a show that had pretty good Arbitron ratings, to boot. My understanding is that she still works in broadcast media (see the Q100 article). GGreeneVa 04:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- According to WWWQ (FM), Brien is "[c]urrently in Tampa working in television". That doesn't mean that she's actually on television, or doing anything else notable. I would also argue that a one-year stint as a morning-drive DJ doesn't make a person notable, unless such a person becomes particularly famous or controversial in that role. NatusRoma | Talk 18:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Fair point -- so I looked around and found that she does, in fact, have a show. Link: http://www.thespotonline.tv/.
-
- I understand where you were coming from -- it looks like the Lindsey Brien and WWWQ articles both need edits to reflect new information. If the premise that she hadn't done anything after RW had been true, I'd probably say delete the article as well. --GGreeneVa 18:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.