Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Roberts (QVC presenter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 07:53, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Julia Roberts (QVC presenter)

Subject is nonnotable. Powers 03:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Note: I'm sure I don't have to mention this, but a simple Google search for "Julia Roberts" won't exactly be useful in establishing notability... Powers 04:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Nominator. Powers 03:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn-bio. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 04:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The QVC lady for the UK, just because that bores you doesn't mean it should be deleted Ruby 04:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, proving that tedious mediocrity, if exercised over a sufficient span of time, does accumulate into notability ... Adrian Lamo ·· 05:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, doesn't sound all that special, but article establishes notability nevertheless. JIP | Talk 10:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Obvious Keep. Being notable as a pestilential huckster is still being notable. Monicasdude 13:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I seem to recall another QVC presenter recently submitted to AfD and deleted as non-notable. Unfortunately, I can't remember her name. =( Maybe I'm wrong. Powers 16:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Adrian Lamo. youngamerican (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete She may have her 15 minutes, but she's not notable. KillerChihuahua^?!? 01:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

If by 15 minutes you mean 13 years, then yes :) Adrian Lamo ·· 01:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm seeing neither notability nor potential for expansion. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 01:36, Feb. 12, 2006
• Delete per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 04:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, presenting a TV show for 13 years seems to do it for me. Stifle 23:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Stifle. Wikipedia has kept many for much less. Arbustoo 01:04, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, legit TV person. Kappa 18:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.