Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Bardavid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 02:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Joshua Bardavid

Non-notable _→AzaToth 01:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO. 58 Ghits, first two are Wikipedia. Royboycrashfan 01:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Royboy. ConDem^Talk 02:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:VAIN. Danny Lilithborne 18:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Royboy. Fetofs ^Hello! 02:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Royboy. Sheehan (Talk) 03:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 04:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Very weak keep. Should there be a notability standard for attorneys? This guy looks to have been directly involved in an unusual number of fairly high profile cases. Is that just par for the course in immigration law? I hadn't heard of Bardavid, but I wouldn't have rushed to delete this. On the other hand, I do see that the article creator has done nothing else on Wikipedia, which raises the likelihood of vanity. Kestenbaum 01:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.