Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh McFarland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 00:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Josh McFarland

Vanity entry, entirely non-notable: googling "josh mcfarland" poker turns up one college link 2005 00:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable. Wait until he becomes "...one of the best in the world someday."Ted 01:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ted & nom.--blue520 01:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Does not meet WP:BIO. —ERcheck (talk) @ 01:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

  Comment Failure to meet WP:BIO does not mean that this subject must not be included. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 05:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nonnotable NawlinWiki 01:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone else. --Slgrandson 01:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. —Khoikhoi 02:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 04:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is obviously a vanity article. Moreover, there is a lack of references. These reasons should be enough to delete this article. However, failure to meet WP:BIO should not be a strong reason to delete this article. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 05:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN vanity. --Firsfron of Ronchester 05:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete CSD A7 Vanity. ~Kylu (u|t) 06:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat 07:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Mr Stephen 10:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Adambiswanger1 19:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn -M^ask 20:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• strong delete not notable, hearsay, per above. Trm3 11:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Hardly notable, does not meet the requirements for WP:BIO and reads simply like a vanity page.--Auger Martel 10:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.