Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph D. Schleimer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Joseph D. Schleimer

Article has undergone major revision and deletion, including possible vandalism. In its current form has no independent references and no verifiable notability of the subject. Requires either major revision, reversion to a previous edit acceptable to consensus, or deletion. Dugwiki 20:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

P.S. My appologies if I'm using the wrong template here. This is the first time I've had to deal with re-proposing something for deletion. Also, please note that it appears that user Wellreadone has altered multiple revisions to this article with no discussion or reasoning in the edit history, including removing sections of the article and notability tags. This has left the article with almost no information verifying notability of the lawyer. So either the old information, if verifiable, needs to be reverted in, or the article should probably be deleted. Either way, it seemed prudent to reopen for discussion given how much the article has changed.Dugwiki 20:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, no notability established. 34 unique Google hits (out of 164), including a significant number on Wikipedia or mirror sites. --Thorsten1 18:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - This revision (among others) states that he's worked for a lot of famous people. If there are any high profile actions in connection with those, maybe there's a basis for an article. Otherwise, this should probably be deleted. My Alt Account 20:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable entertainment lawyer, from what I can tell. No articles link except, oddly Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists ... if it's the same guy, the article isn't particularly notable. --Dhartung | Talk 23:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• FYI - I noticed that, once again, Wellreadone has reverted the article without comment and deleted the prod tag. Will reinsert the tag he removed. Dugwiki 15:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.