Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones's period proxy algorithm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jones's period proxy algorithm

Delete: This is "original research"; specifically, it's an algorithm that was supposedly created by the unverified "R.C. Jones", and is completely superseded by standard algorithms in the field. Note, as well, comments on the discussion page by other individuals. Kuleebaba 13:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Quite right; Delete. Septentrionalis 03:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The evidence for it being original research is quite strong. No references in the article, I couldn't find anything on MathSciNet (though a common name like Jones makes searching hard) and this sci.crypt thread also did not turn up anything, except that the algorithm is not that good (some of the people commenting at the thread may also have commented on the Wikipedia talk page). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the no original research policy. I await proper references (if any). --Chan-Ho (Talk) 10:52, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.