Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hanline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a wholly unsourced biography of a living person (I managed to confirm exactly 2 data: Josh South exists and was in some way associated with the Republican Party in Florida in February 2006.) that had no non-controversial version in its entire history. Start again, citing sources for everything. If you cannot cite reliable sources that are independent of M. South, do not write. Uncle G 19:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Hanline

John Hanline (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Irrelevant article

• Comment This article was created as Josh South and was a bio of someone of that name. The nominator expanded the article. Since then it's been totally blanked, and then moved to this name, despite the fact that none of the versions seem to mention anyone named John Hanline. The article is totally empty except for the AFD notice. Can you tell us what is going on here? Fan-1967 18:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. The blanking is apparently because of libelous claims of an affair, such as here. wikipediatrix 18:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• So who's John Hanline? Fan-1967 18:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't know but I do know he probably isn't notable. John Hanline + Florida on Google gets only four hits. wikipediatrix 18:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• Is it sourced? Otherwise, delete per WP:BLP/WP:N, take your pick. - Mailer Diablo 18:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.