Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Deere Buck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 18:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Deere Buck, John deere Gator

Unencyclopedic. Information belongs best on the manufacturer's web site. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 23:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as quickly as possible - advertisement that appears to be lifted from a promotional pamphlet. B.Wind 04:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete both per nom. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 16:23, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Just needs a bit of a cleanup. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 09:00, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Fixed Gator Article: but still missing the History. Buck Article: Fixed not enoughf history to menchion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.17.198.220 (talk • contribs).

This AfD debate is being relisted in order to prompt a more thorough consensus. Please place new discussion below this line. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 14:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Existing things. mikka (t) 18:20, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep at least Gator. This is a unique vehicle type that has important characteristics/features. That would be what the article should focus on. Some discussion of how many different types of organizations find this vehicle useful might help matters as well. The article is currently in need of a lot of work but the topic is notable and encyclopedic in my view. Buck, on the other hand could probably stand to be merged into the all-terrain vehicle article, as this vehicle does not have unique aspects the way the Gator does... so Keep Gator and Merge Buck... ++Lar 19:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. No less worthy than Fiat 127. Movementarian 21:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep both vehicles but articles need serious help. -- DS1953 06:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.