Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Calderazzo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as a non-notable musical biography, WP:Music and WP:BIO both refer. (aeropagitica) 18:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Joey Calderazzo
Non-notable and unsourced. I was taking the advice of someone to make sure and stick to articles and out of politics, which is a good idea although I'm drawn to it. So I hit random article and get this page, and am now getting into politics...
Anyway, the article is nearly two years old, with no discussion page until today when I commented on my earlier prodding of it (which I decided not to do after all). There are no sources for any of the information. I don't think sources are a possibility either - top hits on google are his own website, a music listing whose biography on him is identical to the one found on his own webpage, and a bunch of downloading sites. Even Sick Puppies is sourced, so it's no great feat. Probably not notable enough to have sources, thus delete. Milto LOL pia 22:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete per ingenious reasoning of the nominator (me). Milto LOL pia 22:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)- On second thought, it might have potential. It's been unsourced for over 16 months, but not 16 minutes after I posted something to my talk page about it, GTBacchus came up with two sources I'd skipped over. Still not sure if anyone cares about this guy, but it's enough to make me change to neutral. Milto LOL pia 02:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep, AllMusic calls him "potentially significant"[1], and he's worked with some key musicians like Branford Marsalis, and he's released albums on Columbia and Blue Note (which is a well-regarded jazz label). --Dhartung | Talk 05:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete until he gets more than "potentially significant"! SkierRMH,07:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable enough to have reliable sources. Voretustalk 18:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
