Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Ritchie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 13:27Z
[edit] Joe Ritchie
Fails WP:BIO and Wikipedia:Notability; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy McKay (trader), Al Weiss. Seems this is One in a large series of article spam: see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Spam/2006_Archive_Dec#Major_article_spam.3F. --Hu12 12:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, clearly notable.--Ioannes Pragensis 23:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Unencyclopedaic, much of the information is irrelevant, does not seem notable. Delete unless cleaned up and expanded making a case for notability during AfD. Pleclech 23:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not meet criteria for sufficient notability listed in the Wikipedia:Notability (people)--Hu12 00:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per world record attempt. Just H 00:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep In the world of Money management, ever since there was such a job title created only a few have become notable. If there is a "Money Management Hall of Fame" this person would be in it. Read the lead paragraph its all in there and referenced. There is proven verifiability from reliable sources [1]. Here is the references for when he tried to buy Eastern Airlines[2]
- Tried to singlehandlely overthow the Taliban, feature story at the International Herald Tribune & CNN
- All referenced. Read the Lead paragraph!!
- Trade2tradewell 00:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep but needs to have the puffery removed. JamesMLane t c 16:33, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
