Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewpedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jewpedia

Irrelevant, Jewpedia has 6 articles! Sanbec 08:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Completely not notable. DarthVader 08:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Only 6 articles, database errors, one editor and no activity since 2004 --Peripitus (Talk) 09:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 09:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. – Kieran T ^{(talk | contribs)} 09:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB and I concur with Peripitus... 6 articles and no activity in 2 years is a long way from meeting the guidelines.--Isotope23 13:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Wikipedia is not for things that seemed like a good idea at the time. If this were new, I'd consider giving this a chance, but after 2 years? Sorry. --DarkAudit 14:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable website, WP:WEB refers.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  15:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Daniel575 16:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Jon513 16:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Timothy Chavis 2:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this discussion alone would constitute something like 20% of the content on it in terms of length, far too small and apparently abandoned for some reason. SM247^{My Talk} 23:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. ---Baba Louis 23:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Do we have some kind of sister projec that could guarantee an article for every wiki-based encyclopedia? It seems like a shame to delete these even though they are clearly non-notable. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 00:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 2791 page views and 5 users, according to Special:Statistics? So old version of MediaWiki that it doensn't even have Special:Version? Heck, my one-user MediaWiki site almost beats these stats (and wins by article count of 143), and it's been running less than 4 months... looks like this site hasn't got much wind under its wings even from its core users. And not even spammers seem to be bothered to visit. ::shakes head slowly:: --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even this discussion is longer than all the artciles of this wiki! --Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 10:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.