Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Supremacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jewish Supremacy

Jewish Supremacy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Just maybe there is something here, but nothing in the article demonstrates what. It started off as an Antisemitic diatribe and has now been reduced to a dismissal of its own title. Either the term has some currency, and relates to a concept worthy of an encyclopedia article, and hence there is an article here that can be written from citable sources—if so, show us—or there isn't and this should be deleted. Jmabel | Talk 05:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Hehe for the record:

Surely works of Jewish Cabal :-) `'mikkanarxi 22:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. I see no sources, and I can't find any. -Amarkov blahedits 05:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. - crz crztalk 06:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No sources to back up any claim relating to this article. Original research.Duhon
  • Delete Non-notable insult. Kla'quot 07:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This is just asking for trouble. A pointless article which serves no purpose except as a Neo-Nazi troll-magnet. --Folantin 08:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this neoligism violating Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms, as there is no such universal term. It's drivel and racist nonsense, just how "supremacist" were the six million Jews killed in the Holocaust and in other massacres? This is just a projection of the imaginings of racist White supremacists who assume that the Jews "think" like them, when the opposite is the case, Jews have stood at the forefront of helping other people make headway, with self-abnegation and often at their own peril. IZAK 09:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per IZAK. --Daniel575 | (talk) 10:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 14:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete racist, unsourced nonsense, and the term seems to be used by anti-semitic sites. Wikitionary has a definition of the term[1], which is all we really need. Hut 8.5 18:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete in the name of all that is holy (or, hell, even on behalf of non-holy entities). -- Kicking222 19:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. If the term could be proven as having widespread cultural usage (i.e. notability), then *Merge into Antisemitism -Markeer 19:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No indication of any widespread use of the term.--Anthony.bradbury 22:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — The author says it all - "there is no evidence to back up this claim." –- kungming·2 (Talk) 22:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Amoruso 22:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete with extreme prejudice - Put a stake through its heart, bury it at a crossroads, and salt the ground. --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 23:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete on the grounds that even the article suggests there is no evidence to back up claims therein. I'd say speedy, but I can't say "attack".... --Dennisthe2 23:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. ←Humus sapiens ну? 00:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --DLandTALK 01:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Camw 02:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete There are no sources, and the little text present either denies its existence or slyly implies that it does (wink, wink) with out any support either way. Alansohn 06:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete for now. I suspect this term describes a real and notable concept. However, the article in its present state doesn't provide any useful and non-biased information on it. Delete unless or until someone creates a truly encyclopedic article on this topic. —Psychonaut 13:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not really a notable term like White supremacy or Islamofascism. ReverendG 23:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm the author of the current article, I just changed it to make it sound better, but that's the most I can do. I can't make it an actually used term with sources, so delete.
  • Delete, make this thing a snowball already. Seraphimblade 07:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - This isn't just a snowball, it's a blizzard! This can be closed as soon as an admin notices it. Doc Tropics 17:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete (Hah I bet no one saw that coming!). The term is very common (just do a google search) and is used by both anti-semites and in a more general context (see for example [2]). However, I'm not able to find any reliable sources that discuss the term enough to make it any more than the tiny stub it is now. JoshuaZ 23:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - It's real in the sense that anti-semites use it to justify their positions. Perhaps it would be best merged into the Anti-semitism article, if it's not already there. --Elipongo 18:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article is unsourced and has no real substantive content. --Metropolitan90 01:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia%7EArticles_for_deletion_Jewish_Supremacy_2941.html"