Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Lascelles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 02:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jeremy Lascelles
Speedy Delete (CSD A7) -- I've AFD'd this as while i believe no claim to notability is established, other editors may disagree. This person is over 41st in line for the throne, has done nothing notable. Being in line isnt really notable, when everyboody in the UK is in line. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 19:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- mergeto George Lascelles, 7th Earl of Harewood . If this is the same Jeremy Lascelles who is CEO of Chrysalis Records Music division, that would make him notable and eligible of an entry in his own right, but have so far been unable to establish this. Ohconfucius 03:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per other articles nominated by same user -- Roleplayer 02:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- "everybody in the UK is in line." Not true. After about 500 people it starts going through the Norwegian royal family. Dev920 12:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep- as noted in the preceding comment, Matthew has obviously no knowledge of the rules of succession judging by his false statements. Astrotrain 14:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- AFD is not a vote, and the above reason irrelevant to AFD. The subject is not included on the royal.gov.uk succession list and the article fails to demonstrate the degree of notability suggested by WP:BIO. Even if Ohconfucius is correct, the difficulty in determining if this is the same person argues very strongly that the subject is not sufficiently notable, in terms of reporting, for inclusion. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- OK then- how about being in the line of succession to the British throne is notable Astrotrain 21:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- AFD is not a vote, and the above reason irrelevant to AFD. The subject is not included on the royal.gov.uk succession list and the article fails to demonstrate the degree of notability suggested by WP:BIO. Even if Ohconfucius is correct, the difficulty in determining if this is the same person argues very strongly that the subject is not sufficiently notable, in terms of reporting, for inclusion. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into some article about his family provided that reliable references are added. Ardric47 20:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
