Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Griffith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Love Indoctrination and Keep Jeremy Griffith. Cbrown1023 talk 19:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jeremy Griffith

Jeremy Griffith (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Love Indoctrination (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Two articles about some guy with his own website and his psychological theory. If you can deal with the mind-numbing prose of this article and (especially) its related one Love Indoctrination, then you can pinpoint the rather obvious WP:COI and WP:ATT issues with accuracy. Prods removed by author. JuJube 08:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:V unless properly sourced and referenced by end of this AfD Alf^Photoman 15:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - the POV and conflict of interest problems are insurmountable. - Richardcavell 00:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete one, keep the OtherJeremy Griffith page has been improved to be in line with policies by initial author. The Love Indoctrination page can be removed. FishoFish 02:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Jeremy Griffith as it has been improved by the author (sources added, major parts excised). Delete Love indoctrination. -- Black Falcon 00:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Jeremy Griffith and Delete Love Indoctrination. Griffith appears to meet the notability guidelines, though the sources I located in a cursory search were only related to his disputes with the press - e.g. the dispute with ABC (cited in article) and the Sidney Herald[1]. If the article is kept, it needs a POV overhaul.--Kubigula (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.