Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeniferever
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jeniferever
Under the guidelines of WP:MUSIC this band is not notable. No full lengths albums according to the article.
- Delete per my nom. ---J.Smith 02:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Just one EP out on the street --Ruby 03:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable musical group. Adrian Lamo ·· 06:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable, fails to meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. --Terence Ong 06:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC. --Kinu t/c 06:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Arbustoo 09:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable as a prime example, along with Sigur Ros, of European post-rock music, recommended by Drowned in Sound and music blog after music blog. 73,000+ Google hits. This vote won't change the consensus, but maybe will be noted when they inevitably appear on AfD again a few months from now. zafiroblue05 | Talk 06:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Listed on lots of music blogs, reviewed in national media (The observer), keep keep keep. :) I make it 99,400 google hits for "jeniferever". Full length album will be out in a matter of days in sweden, and in the UK early march.
-
- Comment: WP:MUSIC "Has released two or more albums on a major label..." ---J.Smith 02:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Then why do we have a very lengthy Arctic Monkeys article, when they have 1 album. It's not a hard-and-fast rule.
- Comment: WP:MUSIC "Has released two or more albums on a major label..." ---J.Smith 02:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.