Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaw drop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --- Glen 05:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jaw drop

a cliff face. No independent confirmation that the name is anything other than one person's nickname (the article is more than 50% vanity, too). Googling "Jaw drop"+cliff+"British Columbia" returns 42 unique non-wiki hits. And 42 of those 42 are not about this cliff face. Grutness...wha? 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Joshua Bender is notable, but the cliffs he attempts are not. Also, only 12 Google results, few which are relevant.--TBCTaLk?!? 00:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 01:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Aplomado ^talk 01:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I think I saw this one on the dead-end pages list and thought it was a good candidate for deletion then. Vanity for sure. zephyr2k 02:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Dennis The TIger 04:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - this is sipmly non-notable. —Khoikhoi 05:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Michael 07:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ale_Jrb^talk 09:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Lankiveil 11:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete simply non notable. Thε Halo ^Θ 11:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete minor local landmarks (which most climbing cliffs count as) normally belong merged into the locale's article. Original author no longer active, and no indication of where this is near (for merging). LinaMishima 12:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ergative rlt 21:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• delete as a vanity Benon 22:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• isn't there some kind of expression to redirect this to? Until then, delete RN 00:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unsourced, and unverifiable. -- Whpq 00:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -AMK152 01:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pointless ReverendG 02:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Probable geographic neologism. Robert A.West (Talk) 04:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.