Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java2K

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Java2K

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 01:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - this is a joke, not a real programming language. Zetawoof^(ζ) 08:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment This is a real (albeit esoteric) programming language. —Ruud 20:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
    • The fact that the primary reference is in a subdirectory called "humor" suggests that its primary purpose in life is as a joke. Zetawoof^(ζ) 01:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I agree, not a real programming language, hence it being marked as "esoteric", but still, useless cruft for an encyclopaedia. No claim of notability from this one. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment This is a real (albeit esoteric) programming language. —Ruud 20:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable programming language. JIP | Talk 09:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, this one strikes me as a joke. Jumbo Snails 01:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment This is a real (albeit esoteric) programming language. —Ruud 20:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 20:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this real, esoteric, and unfortunately non notable language. Equendil Talk 00:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.