Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Cox (philosopher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-08 11:17Z

[edit] Jan Cox (philosopher)

Jan Cox (philosopher) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

not a notable person and I can't find anything that says he was a philospher, anywhere outside of his own site. This bio has, though not currently, been a page full of debate. If you google this guy, you will note that only two places show up, his site and wikipedia. I went to the profile months ago to cool down the hostile debates and even after later posting on the Philosophy Wikproject, nothing[1]. I see no reason to keep an article that can't attract non-follower comments or even any reliable or verifiable sources. Addionally, most of the language was changed by me to remove the obvious POV, and I will not be offended to see it go. Additionally, I found that others agree here [2] --Maniwar (talk) 02:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete We are judging whether the subject is N. Obviously he wont be considered a philosopher by anyone else, but he might be considered N as a writer or a crank. However, I could not find any book review in Book Review Index for his book Dialogues of Gurdjieff,. DGG 22:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless the article becomes properly refed with real evidence of notability. And if kept, rename since he doesn't seem to be a philosopher in any meaningful sense NBeale 23:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless reliable non-trivial second party references are added by end of this AfD Alf^Photoman 23:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.