Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James DeBello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Wikibofh 14:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] James DeBello

Minor actor. Listing on IMDB means precisely nothing when it comes to notability. Delete. --Calton | Talk 05:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Has credits on several notable films. Not my kind of films, but I think he is notable--Rogerd 05:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I messed up (nomination), twice (deletion)... being in more than one notable film would make one notable. At least notable enough for an online encyclopedia. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 05:53, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep pretty obvious based on imdb credits. Obviously, the article shouldn't just recite imdb credits, but those credits easily qualify this article's existence. --rob 06:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets IMDB-related guidelines (if any exist) for Wikipedia a load better than some other actors we've got on here. Some pretty good credits, even if some of the films are not as major as the others. Filmography is not quite complete, as a quick gander at the database proves, but the non-filmography part of the article probably needs to be expanded too. Bobo192 06:30, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• I don't know this guy. Are any of the mentioned IMDB major speaking roles. If I remember correctly, wasn't he one of the early victims in Scary Movie 2? - Mgm|^(talk) 09:22, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, is in several major films and seems to have main roles in them. the wub "?!" 12:33, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Agreed. Seems notable enough. (As an aside, Roger, Roy, Rob and Bob (Rob!) all contributed keep votes in the space of 50 minutes. Now I know they're absolutely not the same person but it just goes to show how strange coincidences can happen. If only there was a horse running today of the same or similar name I'm darned sure it'd be a winner!) Marcus22 14:28, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Bob? Me? That's Bob with an O. The O is a crucial part of my identity! I suppose. Bobo192 20:32, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. --Jacquelyn Marie 19:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, seems notable enough, and besides, I want to keep the Bob/Rob thing going. Lord Bob 19:36, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and please accept my apologies for breaking up the Bob/Rob bandwagon. Hall Monitor 20:09, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, as he is notable. Carioca 22:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.