Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamba Juice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep as nomination is withdrawn and nobody has expressed a wish to delete this. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jamba Juice

Delete per WP:CORP. Nice co. but doesn't meet the stringent requirements set forth therein. the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 04:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. They have over 500 locations -- which version of WP:CORP are you looking at? bikeable (talk) 04:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Definitely notable. dbtfz^talk 05:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - Extremely definitely notable. Georgewilliamherbert 05:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• Oh I know it's notable, but WP:CORP reqires either

1. multiple works,
2. indexes of important co's, or
3. stock market significance,

and this has neither. It's a notable juice chain that fails WP:CORP. the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 05:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Did you even bother to google it? It's being bought: [1] [2] [3] ; it has 70 entries total on news.google.com ... Georgewilliamherbert 05:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• oh, please. Google News gives me 153 current articles about JJ. I do think that the second and third criteria give too little weight to privately-held companies, but that's not a matter for AfD. bikeable (talk) 05:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep Good grief. Jamba Juice has 72 hits in major US newspapers in the last 12 months per Lexis/Nexis, the most recent being March 14, 2006 in the San Francisco Chronicle .Thatcher131 05:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • "multiple non-trivial published works" apparently includes newspaper stories. Here I thought it was scholarly or industry articles. It's my misinterpretation of WP:CORP. Apologies to all. WITHDRAWN the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 05:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• OK, speedy keep guidelines allow for it when the nomination is withdrawn and there are no delete votes. Speedy keeping now. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.