Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalal Haddad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August ☎ 19:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jalal Haddad

Vanity article. First, Do a search for this person on google, and you wouldn't find any relevant links. Second, I remember seeing the image in a a forum belonging to a certain user, the picture doesn't seem also to be a promotional cover. And last, check the contributions of the anon user who created the article, they are all vandalism. (Please if this article get deleted, delete the photo as well.) CG 18:57, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. A Google search for "Jalal Haddad" composer gets 0 results. --TM ^(talk) 19:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment, no vote. User:Cedar-Guardian, who posted the nomination, seems rather proud of making nominations for deletion. He keeps a page of his nominations. This makes the nomination somewhat suspect. Could he be trying to up his count? ♠ DanMS 00:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • lol, the only reeason I'm keeping my nominations in my page is to remember to check them, because I usually tend to forget nominations I've made, or questions I've asked. It's not that I'm proud of it. CG 15:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Dan, people keeping a list of their nominations is not completely uncommon and it can serve many purposes, please assume good faith rather than jumping to conclusions. --TM ^(talk) 18:40, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • I stand corrected. I apologize to User:Cedar-Guardian. I retract the remark. No hard feelings, I hope. ♠ DanMS 00:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Thank you for your apology. No harm done. :-) CG 15:20, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per CG. -- Kjkolb 05:13, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.