Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itanic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge with Itanium. -Mysekurity^{(have you seen this?)} 05:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Itanic

Not encyclopedic, or merge with Itanium. Mirror Vax 03:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and/or redirect to Itanium -Meegs 16:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per Meegs, or keep. I've seen this term in a number of places during the early days of the itanium. — RJH 16:59, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Itanium. --StuffOfInterest 19:20, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Itanium. No need to have separate content under this name. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 20:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Itanium; perhaps merge a little content, but there doesn't seem to be much that needs keeping (maybe clarify that it's a pun on Titanic, as this might conceivably not be obvious to non-NSoE readers). — Haeleth Talk 22:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Itanium per above. Jtmichcock 02:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak redirect, weak because it is just a pun. Pavel Vozenilek 23:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.