Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is wikipedia anti-authoritarian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete (by judgment of this admin as patent nonsense) --Nlu 22:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Is wikipedia anti-authoritarian
The article is both not neutral and original research, and irredemably so. Positive or negative, Wikipedia is not a soapbox for opinion pieces. Uncle G 18:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - this is an original essay (unless the author can cite independent sources); besides Wikipedia is not a democracy - See : Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- Delete - High octane POV. But it's also very bad to have the title in the form of a question but the article in the form of an answer. Bergsten 20:20, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete POV and self-referential. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 20:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete POV. RasputinAXP talk contribs 22:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
