Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ironwork

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Splash 01:57, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ironwork

Simple dictdef, plus a few links. Delete or Transwiki to wictionary, as appropriate. DES 19:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Keep and Transwiki, created article as part of WikiProject Missing articles. Listed in both 1911 and 2004 Britannica, so other strong sources indicate that there is encylopedic material available about the topic. Links were included to expedite article growth. Leonsimms 19:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

• Rule of thumb: Any non-proper noun can be made into a decent article. Keep this, I think it could expand to something useful. Agentsoo 19:35, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, why should this go back to being a missing article? Kappa 19:57, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Also should include a link to Ironworks for those looking for the industrialization topic. Mmmbeer 20:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per above. Great potential for an encyclopedic article with this subject. Fernando Rizo T/C 22:31, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Notable topic. Capitalistroadster 00:53, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Have now expanded this. No Change of vote from keep. Capitalistroadster 11:23, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as expanded. I think I may have been too fast on the trigger with this one. But boy does VfD work as a {{fast-expand}} with possibly useful articles :) Thanks. DES 15:41, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as expanded. (VfD sometimes helps with articles). Pavel Vozenilek 19:26, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Obvious now, but it should have been when it was nominated too. Please at least do a quick google search, or read the links in the article, to see if the subject is worth being covered. This topic is an obvious one that should. - Taxman ^Talk 16:03, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.