Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioviphurn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 03:57, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ioviphurn

Notability not established. Most, if not all, Google hits only refer to their website. 202.156.6.54 23:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

• ???, shall we move the Ioviphurn info page to another website then, nei? --Kloy1334 03:03, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes it will be a good idea... Don't take it personal, please. But I am afraid it does not meet requirements to become an entry here, my friend. -202.156.6.54 03:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not personal, but what about all of the other constructed languages? (The ones that actually look like a complete copy of another language) --Kloy1334 03:14, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
      • I think it depends on the notability of the CL concerned. However there may be some people who will disagree with me, so let's wait for other comments here. -202.156.6.54 03:20, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
        • I understand but methinks that if the other CLs are just in existant here on Wikipedia and there is a CL being worked on everyday that's not listed, then it isn't that fair to leave it out. (Just a thought) Anyone know of any free one page web hosts for my article? or could I subdomain it on my current site? --Kloy1334 03:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Indeed, until today I had never heard of this language, and the number of ghits makes me suspect that it is completely unknown even within the conlanger community. As for other conlangs: there are indeed a fair amount of them, but keep in mind that they all have to meet certain requirements of notability. The article doesn't make it clear that it meets any of them. Besides, it's generally not taken well when people write articles about themselves or their own creations. Please take a look at the discussion at Wikipedia:Conlangs to get an impression. Jeff, I strongly suggest that you move this page to the Conlang wiki and/or to your own userspace. You also might consider submitting it to Langmaker.com. --IJzeren Jan 09:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your respone, I shall move this article to langmaker and other such CL websites. Please note that upon recognition, This article will return to Wikipedia in a few weeks.
    • Just checked out langmaker and LangMakerWin, very amateur programs (the basic template doesn't include numbers or words such as "you" and "I."), any other sites?
      • Hang on, are you referring to the LangMaker software? But that's not what I mean! Langmaker is a conlang directory, by far the most extensive one on the Internet. Any conlang should have an entry there. See here. --IJzeren Jan 06:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.