Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invalid Litter Dept.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was keep, no consensus for merge. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 12:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invalid Litter Dept.

WP:MUSIC not notable —The preceding unsigned comment was added by David Humphreys (talk • contribs) .

• Delete....I probably would've prod'd it. AdamBiswanger1 03:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ori.livneh (talk • contribs).
• Keep From notable artist and notable album. AtDi's complete discography has seperate articles why shouldn't this single?. This article just needs expanded to match the others: Rolodex Propaganda One Armed Scissor. --IslaySolomon 03:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Merge This really needs to be expanded and sourced and not deleted. It's from record of a notable band. Song from notable band, from an album, should be inculded in album's page. Yanksox 04:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with the album from which this originates. -- Koffieyahoo 05:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Relationship of Command per Koffieyahoo. Can be expanded later but at the moment it looks like a permastub --Peripitus (Talk) 08:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if expanded, or merge otherwise. It is a single, so it could merit inclusion on its own. However, if all the page says is that it was a single, that info should be put on the album page and the song should be a redirect. FYI, I adored ATDI. In fact, I was listening to them at work this morning. -- Kicking222's station is non-operational 20:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • With Jeff's excellent editing, you can now change my vote to strong keep. -- Kicking222 writes to remember 14:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with album per Koffieyahoo. Coming from someone who loves the song, I don't think expansion will do much except include more technical details about the single, and I'm not sure it's notable enough (as a single) to merit that. For that matter, the pages for the other singles could probably be merged, too, under a "Singles" subcat. HumbleGod 23:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep, notable single by incredibly notable band. Infobox added with image. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, agreed, a noteable single by a very noteable band, i wouldn't be surprised to find it created again if simply deleted --Amusingmuses 01:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.