Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Sampling Union
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] International Sampling Union
There is nothing to sugest that this organization exists. If it does, nothing on first page of google. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are the same article, one misspelled, both non-notable.:
- Internatiol Sampling Union -Royalguard11Talk 18:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Both as nominator. -Royalguard11Talk 18:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V. Article needs verifiable sources to establish notability. Scorpiondollprincess 18:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete there are no sources provided and googling turns up nothing. The user User:Commodity sampler has also created several related articles also with a lack of sources or verifiability. Note that a contact address of Commoditysampler@comcast.net is provided in this article as well as Society of Accredited Commodity samplers -- Whpq 18:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Should we add that article to this AfD, or is it too late? -Royalguard11Talk 18:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's not too late, though, to be proper, the two who have already voted should be asked to amend their votes to make it clear whether they also wish the third entry deleted. Fan-1967 20:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nominated for sepetate delete here. -Royalguard11Talk 21:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's not too late, though, to be proper, the two who have already voted should be asked to amend their votes to make it clear whether they also wish the third entry deleted. Fan-1967 20:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.