Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indik

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. IceKarmaॐ 03:25, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Indik

Discussion moved from Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English:

Looks like Spanish. -- PFHLai 04:29, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

As I'm not much of a bar goer, I have no clue how true this is, but I translated it.--Orgullomoore 04:06, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: The only Thomas Indik that google returns is an attourney in Philadelphia, may be a retarded joke....--Orgullomoore 04:08, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Another note: The same text has been submitted to the corresponding article on es: and was deleted as patent nonesense--Orgullomoore 04:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

<end moved discussion>

• No citation. I'm guessing false or non-notable. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Bartending Wikibook or delete. I'm calling Uncle G to resolve this. — Phil Welch 00:06, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• It's a cocktail recipe plus the claimed name of its inventor and some alternative names. The article tells us that this cocktail was invented some three weeks ago. Google turns up nothing, there's nothing by this name in any of my cocktail recipe books, and the article of course cites no sources. As far as Wikipedia goes, this therefore appears to be original research — the promulgation of a new cocktail using Wikipedia.

  Wikibooks has a no original research policy as well. (See What is Wikibooks?.) Although it is (for obvious reasons) a strict one when it comes to educational textbooks, there is little precedent for its application to recipes. Given the problems with this recipe, I haven't transwikified it. Instead, I've left a note on the talk page for the Cocktails section of the Bartending wikibook. This is only worth transwikification if any of the Wikibooks editors dealing with that book, having read this discussion, express a desire to have this recipe.

  Delete. Uncle G 01:57, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. As per Uncle G. / Peter ^Isotalo 12:54, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Dottore So 15:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.