Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian National Congress - IT Cell

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by TheCoffee, Zscout370 as recreation of previously deleted content. Titoxd 05:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Indian National Congress - IT Cell

This page has been Vfded before with a consensus to delete. Non-notable department of a notable organisation Botsie 09:23, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, department of a notable organisation. Kappa 10:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
  • But is the department notable enough to deserve an article for itself? Seems to be just vanity by an officer of the org and the author of Rivaji. If the article was anything beyond a list of office bearers, I'd say merge with Indian National Congress, but the way it is I don't see any value in it. --Botsie 10:47, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
    • Actually I will withdraw my vote. Kappa 16:47, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree that the Congress Party of India is definitely notable; but this article is on the "IT Cell" within it, and notability is not established. It is simply a series of names. Sliggy 12:17, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - has been deleted before and the information in the re-created article is the same as in the old one Vino s 12:50, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This is a politically biased nomination. The nominator is Indian, but he calls the governing party of India "non-notable". Osomec 13:53, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Comment. A close perusal of the article will make clear that this nomination does not refer to Congress Party (which of course must be kept), but is about an affiliated/subsidiary organisation. Sliggy 14:11, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Comment. I voted Congress if you must know. However, the article has failed to establish notability for it's IT Cell. --Botsie 09:21, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete --Quasipalm 16:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Sliggy, i.a. I thought if this has already been vfd, it can be speedily deleted again. Dottore So 17:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Jachin 22:14, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.