Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InSORS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] InSORS

InSORS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only one article links here, looks like just a simple press writeup. --Vossanova ^o< 18:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete - only link is to their own site; no evidence of multiple coverage in independent sources to demonstrate notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 20:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - In my opinion, this is an odd edge case. If you google InSORS, you'll get in excess of 40 thousand hits, all of which are talking about the company. If you check the links out, they usually contain just an off-hand reference or paragraph about the software. Examples: University of Nevada, University of Surrey. But no-one's saying much about the company itself. They're just mentioning that, yes, they use the software for video teleconferencing and yes, they like it. I think rational argument can be made either way, but I'm siding with keep. Chris Croy 00:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - I don't see much in the traditional media (except for one article in the Chicago Sun Times [1]), but they have gotten a lot of coverage in industry publications... for example, GridToday and Ziff Davis's CEO Insight. Due to the nature of wikipedia there is a systematic bias against any field not within the liberal arts or pop-culture. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 17:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.