Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Iceburn

Iceburn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No real evidence of notability per WP:WEB. Possibly comes under WP:NFT as well. Walton monarchist89 19:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - probable neologism as well as reasons given above. – Tivedshambo (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non notable Arnoutf 19:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable use of a non-notable image; original research Leebo⁸⁶ 19:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR, and WP:N. (hello.jpg, anyone?)
• Delete, probably could have been speedied. Natalie 21:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Template:WP:NEO. Keep the discussion short, it's a speedy candidate. Kai A. Simon 23:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Additional Comment - on further inspection, the author even admits that the image in question is "semi-popular". Doesn't bode well for its notability. Walton monarchist89 17:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.