Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Phouska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 17:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I Phouska

I Phouska (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I can find no evidence that this film is notable, but I may well be just not looking hard enough. Neither of the links in the article count as the needed reliable, third party, non trivial published sources. Delete unless notability can be established. J Milburn 12:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep, I've added a review from the film festival mentioned in the article. The film title also transliterates as I Fouska that produces more ghits (mainly in languages I do not read). Nuttah68 13:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Ah, the google results from the alternative translation certainly look like they confer notability. J Milburn 13:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 19:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. We already have an article on the director of this movie, Nikos Perakis. We also have an article on another film of his called Loafing and Camouflage, which won several awards. I like having an article on the director, like having one on Loafing and Camouflage, but recommend deleting this one, which won no awards and doesn't appear to meet the standards in the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (films). Simply to be shown at one film festival is not enough, in my opinion. The link added by User:Nuttah68 is not to a review; it is just the entry for this film in the program of the festival where it was shown in 2002. EdJohnston 03:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly _{(o rly?)} 10:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Per WP:N, lacks substantial third-party coverage. Sandstein 13:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong keep. It's still a stub, lots of potential, decently cited, and we need more representation of Greek cinema in WP. Her Pegship (tis herself) 18:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.