Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. P. Gautam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 11:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I. P. Gautam

Subject non notable. Is a Bureaucrat and not a politician with no significant achievement Doctor Bruno 19:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Strong keep - Gautam is the municipal commissioner (head) of Ahmedabad (the 7th largest city of Ahmedabad with a pop of 5 million). Surely he is notable enough per WP:BIO. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment - surely you mean 7th largest city in India?Blnguyen | rant-line 02:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Oops! is all that I can say!. Yes I meant 7th largest in India. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 11:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - subject has decent press coverage [1] and bureaucrat vs politician isn't an issue - WilyD 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Again, I am not sure why the AfDnewbies tag was added by the nominator. Since when has it become a practice to add these tags to all AfDs? Some explanation from the nominator would help. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Sarah Ewart (Talk) 04:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep — appears to be notable American Patriot 1776 05:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:BIO. -AED 16:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I believe that Aksi_great is telling us that he is the chief bureaucrat/manager of a city of 5 million people? If so, he is notable. Blnguyen | rant-line 02:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per above. --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 07:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep – nom in bad faith. =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.