Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussful
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Radiant_>|< 22:51, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Hussful
dicdef, likely vanity neologism Wyss 03:16, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- delete, probably speedy as nonsense. Mmmbeer 03:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- delete. Eww. Not only dictionary but made-up. How depressing. --Matt Yeager 22:06, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Relisting August 27 for more discussion. Please wait for a few days before closing this, there's no tearing hurry. --Tony SidawayTalk 14:09, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - no hurry, although this is so obviously a delete it's hardly worth discussing. --Doc (?) 14:47, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete neologism Ryan Norton T | @ | C 16:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Why were the three valid votes for deletion the first time around not respected? Sdedeo 19:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. They were, and will be taken into account during the close. That isn't a lot of votes, though--deletions are made on rough consensus. --Tony SidawayTalk 21:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. It seems to be a waste of time to relist something that received three deletes and no substantial arguments for keep. But then again, it's a waste of time for me to argue. :) Sdedeo 22:11, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. They were, and will be taken into account during the close. That isn't a lot of votes, though--deletions are made on rough consensus. --Tony SidawayTalk 21:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.