Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Cook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP--Doc (?) 21:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hugh Cook

Non-notable. Delete -- Spinboy 23:15, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, appears to be a well-published author according to Amazon.com and meets the inclusion criteria of WP:BIO. Hall Monitor 23:47, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Tricky: there are at least two authors named Hugh Cook, one Canadian and one British. I think they're both notable, though. Keep. DS 23:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• While he's certainly not one of the superstars of CanLit, any writer who's been reviewed by Alberto Manguel in The Globe and Mail and David Helwig in the Toronto Star (see here) can't be a complete nobody. Maybe my keep line's too low for published writers, but this one passes it. Bearcat 02:13, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.